Achieve Success in Your Art by being Extraordinary

Posted on May 13th, 2010 in Discussions by Richard

What would you prefer to see? Three pieces of art that really blew you away or twenty average looking and decent works of art? I think most would love to see the three pieces that were amazing as opposed to the average ones.

There may be a lesson here when it comes to creating your artworks. Why not try investing more time into making one piece as spectacular as possible instead of finishing it and moving onto your next creation? There is a common trend that when somebody sees something that really has the way factor they can’t help but tell people about it. Nobody ever rants about something bog standard and average, so think about how you can create more impressive works of art even if it means the you produce less.

In the long run, doing this is likely to give you a much better reputation and people are likely to talk about you much more…. which is always good!

What do you think? Is less really more….

Bookmark and Share
Google Buzz

2 Responses to 'Achieve Success in Your Art by being Extraordinary'

Subscribe to comments with RSS or TrackBack to 'Achieve Success in Your Art by being Extraordinary'.

  1. Gina Mayes said,

    on May 13th, 2010 at 10:32 pm

    I totally agree. Here lately I’ve taken so much more time in between illustrations to render them and add more details.

    Here’s a few of my works in progress… http://www.flickr.com/photos/babybubbleco/sets/72157623406038437/

    Who knows how long it will take me to properly render my food warz illustration… probably like 4 or 5 weekends worth. I think I did this back in March…

  2. debi said,

    on May 14th, 2010 at 4:37 am

    l think people should concider their art more but by the same token, if there were NO poor art what would we have to compare the good art with?

Post a comment

IMPORTANT! To be able to proceed, you need to solve the following simple math (so we know that you are a human) :-)

What is 12 + 9 ?
Please leave these two fields as-is: